Home > Blogs > New Solutions in Green Construction

  • A+
  • A-

New Solutions in Green Construction


Look out for new solutions in Green Construction coming your way!

Building construction causes a lot of carbon dioxide emissions. Reducing it is a big priority today as we talk about a sustainable future.

The low-hanging fruit is the reduction in the quantities of steel and cement concrete – which incur very high emissions of carbon dioxide – or have high embodied energy. Reinforcement steel and cement concrete and walls can account for approximately 70 % of the total embodied energy of construction in the conventional method of Reinforced Concrete Cement (RCC) frame construction.

So, we need to look at structural systems for walls and roofs which economise on steel and RCC.

The other big opportunity is to replace burnt clay brick which incurs high carbon emissions with Fly Ash block and Compressed Stabilised Earth block (CSEB) which incur at least 30% less carbon emissions.

If we combine these two opportunities, we can reduce the carbon emissions of construction by 30% as compared to the usual RCC frame with burnt clay brick infill.

Confined masonry

Most walling materials and walls built with bricks or blockwork have some compressive strength. They can be load bearing walls. Before steel and reinforced concrete became the ‘standard’ practice, buildings were built on load bearing walls. Many buildings up to three-storeys in height are being built with load bearing walls today. The concern with the traditional load bearing constructions is that, in earthquake prone places, the load bearing construction needs to be strengthened to resist the horizontal forces that can occur during an earthquake. The solution is CONFINED MASONRY.

This is how it works:

The walls are raised on a strip foundation with a plinth beam. At every 3 metres and at the corners, a 200 mm space is left for a nominally reinforced RCC column which is tied into the plinth beam. The concerting of the column is done after the wall has been raised. The column reinforcement is tied into the roof slab. No deep RCC beams are required. We now have an RCC network that is integrated with the wall. This system is able to resist the horizontal earthquake forces.


The consumption of reinforcement steel is reduced by about 15% compared to a conventional RCC frame structure. You can build up to four storeys using confined masonry. The walls can be of burnt brick, fly ash blocks, compressed stabilised earth blocks or any other blockwork that has adequate compressive strength. Here is a useful link:

(PDF) Confined Masonry The Current Design Standards ...

https://www.researchgate.net › publication › 335679507_...

Walling material

Good quality, solid fired clay brick incurs very high carbon dioxide emissions.

The new variant is a hollow fired clay brick, which is as strong, but uses 50% less clay and requires 30% less firing energy.

This hollow clay block is made by a precise extrusion process. It saves on the plaster thickness for internal and external plasters. Additionally, it has good insulation value – about the same as that of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Block or AAC Block. It provides far better protection from the heat outside compared to all solid block masonry systems. This will be an excellent walling material. 

banner banner

From the point of view of reducing the carbon in walling systems, Compressed Stabilized Earth Blocks (CSEB) is the best, followed by Fly Ash Block. Gradually, CSEB manufacturers who can make standard strength blocks by precise control on soil and cement mixes are coming in the market. This is a promising green material of the future.



Compressed Stabilised Earth Block


Fly Ash Block

Floor Slabs and Roofs

In conventional RCC construction, most of the steel is consumed in the floor slabs that span across the walls and beams. Can we cut down on this steel consumption?

Yes! Here are a couple of methods for short span buildings where the spans are not more than 3.5 meters. This works for affordable housing.

These are one-way span systems.

Shallow Barrel Vault

You can build a shallow barrel vault using bricks and mortar. NO STEEL! The vault geometry is segmental (part of a circle). The springing end of the vault rests on an RCC beam which holds the vault. The crown of the vault is raised one-sixth or one-seventh of the width of the vault. A single layer of bricks is laid radially over an accurately shaped formwork in an interlocking fashion. Mortar is filled firmly in the joints and some stone chips are pressed into the joints. The vault is cured for 15 days and the formwork removed. Walls are raised over the beams and the sides are filled with waste/lightweight material to make a flat floor. The structural work that is done in conventional construction by cement concrete with steel reinforcement is now performed by brick and mortar.


The bricks can be of fired Clay, fly Ash or CSEB of an appropriate strength.


This system reduces the carbon emissions of construction of the suspended floors drastically, especially if you use Fly Ash Block or CSEB. It replaces steel and concrete. It is Green.

Suspended floor slabs with Precast T beams with hollow concrete block infill

In this system, the T beams are prestressed and use only stretched 6mm bars as reinforcement. Between two T beams, hollow concrete blocks, or hollow clay blocks, called Hourdi, are placed. Steel reinforcement network of 8mm bars at say 200mm centres both ways is placed on top and M20 concrete to 50 mm thickness above the blocks is poured. The system is quick to build. It is lighter than a conventional RCC slab and therefore, its steel consumption is about 30% less. It is cheaper, uses less material, and saves on steel. It is Green.


Tee beam supporting the hollow block, topped by lightly reinforced concrete.



Using a pre-stressed beam

Here the beam is not pre-stressed


So, to sum up ….

  • We need to reduce the carbon emissions of construction from the prevalent method of RCC frame with brick infill walls.

  • The biggest contributor to carbon emissions is steel, followed by cement.

  • We need to reduce the steel intensity of structural systems. We can make earthquake-safe four-storey, tall and affordable housing with 25 kg of steel per square meter of floor area.

  • The solution lies in adopting structural systems that are less steel intensive.

  • We can also choose walling materials that incur less carbon emissions than fired clay brick.

Look out for the solutions shown in this blog. They are on their way to the market. They are the future!